My house would be filled from floor to ceiling with books if I purchased all of those in print. Too many print books have teeny-tiny text which is utterly ridiculous. I personally prefer digital for these reasons: I can adjust the font size on my Kindle which makes reading MUCH more comfortable for me. But implying that ebooks are somehow subpar and unreal is idiotic. (Although an environmentalist might disagree about that). There is nothing wrong with still loving print. Another Twitter friend said "A book is real if you can read it." Word.ħ. A friend on Twitter said "If books on Kindle and Nook aren't real does that mean we can buy them with Monopoly money?" (I sure hope so, because I have four Monopoly games in my basement!)Ħ. I would also imagine the millions of authors who publish their digitally-formatted books might disagree with that term.ĥ. I would imagine the millions of readers who spend millions of dollars a year on digital books might disagree about that term.Ĥ. I think she means "print books" but used the unfortunate term "real" implying that digital and audio books are somehow not "real."ģ. That whole smelly book thing is creepy.Ģ. And then a whole slew of authors chimed in that they, also, preferred "real" books.ġ. She likes to "touch" them and "smell" them. Last night an author on Facebook commented that she preferred "real" books, not ebooks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |